Day raises economic red flags as district prepares budget

At the Katonah-Lewisboro school board meeting on Thursday, Jan. 24, board member Charles Day sent up red flags that have been circulating around the board for a number of months concerning the financial health of the district, particularly as the district prepares to enter its budget season with an initial budget presentation at the end of February.

“This has been something that has been percolating with me for several months,” Mr. Day said as he began his presentation.

The numbers

On a simple spreadsheet Mr. Day showed combined data from the recent Finance Advisory Committee Expenditure (FACE) report, an economic forecast for the district, and the recent external demographic study of the district’s significant decline in student enrollment. In his presentation he drew specific attention to 2016, the last year the district’s student population is forecast.

“Not only are these numbers bad,” he said, “now they are getting worse over time.”

In 2009-10 the district’s budget of $106.6 million served 3,774 pupils at a cost of $28,249 per student, according to Mr. Day’s presentation. By 2016 the district budget is estimated to rise by nearly $20 million, to $126 million, while the student population is estimated to drop by more than 800 students to a total of 2,946 students district-wide, according to the presentation. He estimates the district’s per-pupil cost will be $42,781 in 2016, a 51% increase from 2010.

A large part of that is not within the district’s control, he said. Declining demographics are a significant factor in the rise of per-pupil spending. Superintendent of Schools Dr. Paul Kreutzer pointed out that if the budget was to be frozen, the per-pupil cost would still increase based on the decline in student enrollment alone.

Dr. Kreutzer said that those numbers and fears are accurate, considering the estimates for 2010 through 2012 were accurate and the 2013 budget will be presented at an estimated $116.3 million, he said.

“Charles’ numbers are probably, I would almost say, conservative,” Dr. Kreutzer said.

“They’re designed to be conservative and it is still really bad,” Mr. Day said.

The tax cap

“I think the message from this is just staying in the tax cap isn’t necessarily going to lead to a number the community is going to accept,” Mr. Day said. “This is a community that really values education. We bought ourselves an excellent school district. We want to keep the district we have. We have outstanding teachers, but without hyperbole, this is kind of terrifying having a number like this.”

The tax cap, championed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo last year, stipulates that school districts may not raise their tax levies more than 2% or the rate of inflation — whichever is lower — without 60% approval by taxpayers. The law has had mixed reception, with some applauding the effort to rein in taxes and others criticizing it as an impractical financial ceiling.

“Staying within the tax cap alone will not be enough,” Mr. Day said.

Where to cut

Mr. Day acknowledged that there will need to be a multitude of cuts in order to get the district’s financial house in order, but how to accomplish that without sacrificing the improvements made to the school system over the years would be the major challenge.

“There is no one magic bullet,” he said. “If we pare down or redo our facilities, that will solve a fraction of the problem. If we change some of the health benefits of some of our staff, that will solve a fraction of the problem. There isn’t any one thing we are going to have to do. We are going to have to do a whole bunch of things, but we have to have a really sharp eye out on what these numbers are going to look like, because we want to preserve the school system we built here over a long time and it is not going to be tenable to do that just staying within the bounds of the tax cap.”

Driving it home

Emphasizing the need for fiscal reform, Mr. Day also included in his presentation a comparison of the district’s per-pupil spending with that of five districts similar in size and educational quality — Harrison, Bedford, Scarsdale, Byram Hills, and Chappaqua, which together average $26,236 compared with KLSD’s current $32,677 per-pupil cost.

“Those five are all, on an income basis, considerably more wealthy than we are,” Mr. Day said. “The significance of that is not only are we not keeping up with them educationally, but we are spending more to do it and the money we are spending is supported by less income.”

Mr. Day said he specifically brought up these issues as the initial budget is prepared for presentation later next month to inform the process.

“This is something to keep in mind when people are preparing the budget,” he said, “because the numbers are scary, and the longer you wait the scarier they get. I think just coming in a hair under the tax cap won’t be enough.”

Board member Dr. Peter Treyz, who serves on the board’s finance committee, has said that the finance committee’s assessment is that passing budgets right at the tax cap or just below it is unsustainable.

“Theoretically, we should be coming in with a zero [percent] increase, and the next year should be zero or below,” he said. “That is what they are advocating. I am not exactly sure what would have to be cut to do that, but that should be part of an agenda discussion, to have the administration say, ‘You know what? It is finally hitting the fan and we are going to have to make some serious, serious decisions,’ because this whole thing is unsustainable, it really is,” he said.

About author

By participating in the comments section of this site you are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and User Agreement

  • Glenn DeFaber

    I find it very disheartening to hear Mr. Day surprised by the district’s financial condition. Many people including myself have been warning of this for at least ten years or more. Dr. Treyz has been the only board member fighting for fiscal sanity since he was elected. I have been in the audience at board meetings and have observed the snide remarks made by people who feel he is out of touch. The words and body language of past and present board members have reflected those same sentiments. With the numbers in black and white the teachers union still fails to see our future. I guess they don’t care as most do not live in the district or even in New York.

    • A.Z.

      “I guess they don’t care as most do not live in the district or even in New York.”

      Well, there are 386 employees who consented to having their address and phone number appear in the 2012-13 KLSD Employee Directory. Of those employees listed, 20% (79) live in CT and 80% (307) live in NY .

      114 of the employees listed live in the district: Cross River (6), Goldens Bridge (8), Katonah (37), Pound Ridge (5), South Salem (57), and Waccabuc (1).

      Also, 51% of listed employees live in these top 9 towns: South Salem (57), Katonah (37), Yorktown Heights (20), Mahopac (18), Ridgefield (16), Brewster (15), Carmel (12), Danbury (10), and New Milford (10).

      So, yes, many KLSD employees listed live outside the district. However, most are not just across the border in Ridgefield, as some folks keep saying.

  • John Galt

    For decades the land trust used the per-pupil expenditure number as an excuse for taking land off the tax rolls, claiming that each new larger home, of the kind being built elsewhere at the time, would bring new students, each costing that much. When in reality, the number is merely an expression of the total cost of education divided by the number of vibrant, taxpaying assessments.

    If we had built even one third of the larger homes that they campaign against in the 90s, we would have a tax base and average income closer to the other communities that are doing better than we are in delivering quality education services. And maybe an office building, golf course or assisted living center or two paying taxes.

    I don’t see the teachers union caring a rodent’s rump about this. I wonder if the land trust or their wealthy donors who benefited from the tax breaks will kick in a little extra now to help the cause.

  • Sean Harris

    No one wants to address the current litigation, potential buy out and settlement. Imagine the costs. Discrimination against an individual with disabilities, accusations of Child Abuse, incomplete investigations, no documentation in her personnel file, the lies and distortions by Adminstrators, the bad behavior by our leader, the threats made about Peterson, Jess Godin signing letters she did not author, Jess Godin’s avoidance of Peterson, Jess Godin crying at her faculty meeting and Godins lack of self control and professionalism. I wonder what this will cost the KL taxpayers? Maybe Kreutzer should pay the damages. This has all occurred on his watch. The teachers union called it right when they had their rally.

  • Sean Harris

    The best documentation is a letter Peterson has, that was signed by Godin, whereby she as the author (Godin) claims that the District did a complete “investigation”. I seriously question how an investigation is concluded or complete when the student was not evaluated by the school nurse and at no time did any Administrator ever interview Kristin? Even a criminal has more rights!!!!! This screams of NEGLIGENCE at its finest. And I laught at Jrss Godin who was foolish enough to sign her name and be a lackey for Kreutzer.

  • mundtt

    “Imagine the costs…….I wonder what this will cost the KL taxpayers?……. This screams of NEGLIGENCE at its finest”

    Curious. The scales have finally fallen from the eyes of one board member regarding — as GDF so accurately notes – an escalating problem that has been fairly obvious for years, yet negligently ignored. All towns and school districts experience litigation. Name those that may face ~5 yr 50% increase in what is an already-very-high cost per pupil in this economy? Public school education at private school prices coming to a school near you soon?

    I forget my Psych 101; what is on display above? Rationalization? Cognitive Dissonance? Or just plan DENIAL?

    • Glenn DeFaber

      Where is Katresident when you need a little comic relief in such a dire situation. Could one of the Union acolyte’s bloggers be Katresident?

  • Bill S

    John Galt what are you talking about? Let’s assume that those larger homes were to bring in annual taxes of $45,000.00 ( a reasonable estimate based on what an acquatance of mine pays). Let’s further assume that the families living in these larger homes have on average 2 children of school age. The cost to educate these children would be $64,000.00, at the current cost per student. That leaves the rest of the community to pay the shortfall of $19,000.00

© HAN Network. All rights reserved. Lewisboro Ledger, 16 Bailey Avenue, Ridgefield, CT 06877

Designed by WPSHOWER

Powered by WordPress